Comments on OPML 2 expanded Attribute

In response to Dave’s proposal to add an expanded attribute to the OPML 2.0 spec, I have the following thoughts. Typo: “Its optional” should be “It’s optional” As a general matter, I’m not convinced that this belongs in the spec. It seems to me that display properties are the application’s problem, not the file format’s. … Continue reading Comments on OPML 2 expanded Attribute